February 2012 Archives

February 28, 2012

New Approach on Sports Injury Liability

sports.jpg
The Indiana Supreme Court has given the state a new approach for determining liability in sports injury cases. Whereas liability in such cases had previously focused on the conduct of the plaintiffs (i.e., the injured party), in Pfenning v. Lineman the court ruled that it is the actions of the defendant that are paramount.

More specifically, the Court stated that:

We hold that, in negligence claims against a participant in a sports activity, if the conduct of such participant is within the range of ordinary behavior of participants in the sport, the conduct is reasonable as a matter of law and does not constitute a breach of duty.

The ramifications are significant. First, Pfenning has removed "primary assumption of risk" from the equation, shifting the focus from the risks assumed by the injured plaintiff, to the reasonableness of the defendant tortfeasor's conduct. This eliminates all discussion concerning legal duty, and puts the focus on whether the defendant committed any acts of negligence through his or her participation in the sporting activity. Changing the analysis from a duty question to a negligence question may also open the door for claims against sporting facilities or equipment manufactures that previously were protected from claims by the primary assumption of risk doctrine. It will take time to sort out how much change Pfenning actually brings to this area of law.

In sum, Pfenning does serve to clear up a confusing and increasingly untenable series of cases governing sports injury cases. Shifting the focus to the defendant to determine if the conduct falls within the range of ordinary behavior of participants in the sport makes the legal analysis much cleaner. It also opens up the ability to argue the circumstances surrounding the injury and the conduct of the defendant. Additionally, it prevents property owners and equipment manufacturers from latching on to arguments in which they claim no duty or responsibility, thus shielding them from liability. It will be interesting

February 10, 2012

Where to Report Dangerous Intersections in Indiana

The Indianapolis Metropolitan Planning Organization recently released a list of what it considers the most dangerous intersections in Indianapolis.

Here is a list of the Top 10:

1. Binford Boulevard and Keystone Avenue
2. County Line Road and Madison Avenue
3. Post Road at 25th Street
4. Binford Boulevard and Kessler Boulevard East Drive
5. Rural Street at Pearl Street
6. Washington and East Street
7. 30th Street and Central Avenue
8. Holt Road and Morris Street
9. High School Road and Washington Street
10. 29th and Meridian Street

After witnessing several automobile accidents outside of our Indianapolis office and reporting the intersection for its poor visibility, we thought it would be important for people to know how and where to report dangerous intersections.

The Indiana Division of Transportation (INDOT) takes complaints for all state roads, US highways and interstates. If you have a concern with one of these roads, please call (317)232-5333 or fill out an online concern form at www.in.gov/indot/2330.htm.

If you have a complaint about one of the city roads in Indianapolis, contact the Mayor's Action Center at (317)327-4622 or online at www.indy.gov/egov/mayor/mac/Pages/home.aspx.

If you live outisde of Marion County and have a complaint, log on to www.in.gov to find the correct contact number for your city/county.